<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for niels på nettet</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>a one-man meta-scraper</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 03:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on X number of reasons why I sold my Eee&#8230; by budget UMPC roundup &#171; niels på nettet</title>
		<link>http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com/2008/02/03/x-number-of-reasons-why-i-sold-my-eee/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>budget UMPC roundup &#171; niels på nettet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 19:11:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com/?p=11#comment-8</guid>
		<description>[...] and storage size is creeping upwards as well. Judging by my own experience with the Eee (that I blogged about here) this is a good thing. It&#8217;s a pain in the ass to fit your stuff into 4GB of storage and even [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and storage size is creeping upwards as well. Judging by my own experience with the Eee (that I blogged about here) this is a good thing. It&#8217;s a pain in the ass to fit your stuff into 4GB of storage and even [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on google&#8217;s april&#8217;s fool? by ociointernet</title>
		<link>http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com/2008/04/01/googles-aprils-fool/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>ociointernet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com/?p=28#comment-7</guid>
		<description>the Simpsons real Hollywood Actors

leave a comment

http://ociointernet.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the Simpsons real Hollywood Actors</p>
<p>leave a comment</p>
<p><a href="http://ociointernet.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://ociointernet.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on about niels by Google Crawling Technology</title>
		<link>http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com/about/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Crawling Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:32:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-6</guid>
		<description>hello, dear nice to know you ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hello, dear nice to know you <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on How to&#8230; by Google Crawling Technology</title>
		<link>http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com/2008/03/08/how-to/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Crawling Technology</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 16:30:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com/?p=15#comment-5</guid>
		<description>it's really cool features and i like it actually :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it&#8217;s really cool features and i like it actually <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on about niels by bibomedia.com</title>
		<link>http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com/about/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>bibomedia.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 16:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4</guid>
		<description>:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Office for Mac: The software equivalent of a hot dumb blonde? by Geek Lectures - Things geeks should know about &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Office for Mac: The software equivalent of a hot dumb blonde?</title>
		<link>http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/office-for-mac-the-software-equivalent-of-a-hot-dumb-blonde/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Geek Lectures - Things geeks should know about &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Office for Mac: The software equivalent of a hot dumb blonde?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2008 21:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nielsandersen.wordpress.com/2008/01/03/office-for-mac-the-software-equivalent-of-a-hot-dumb-blonde/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>[...] Ari Blackthorne wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptVarious blogs are posting reviews of the new Office for Mac 2008 which according to Wired is due to be released the week of the 14th of January. For all of us who&#8217;ve taken the plunge to intel macs this is good news. Office 2004 was unbearably slow under Rosetta and the beta that I&#8217;ve tried feels a lot more responsive on my Macbook. So far so good. But what about the functionality? Microsoft and Apple both use the Mac Business Unit as an indication that Microsoft is committed to releasing software for the Mac. We mac-users are even special enough that we merit our very own releases. We are also so nice and visual and creative that we don&#8217;t care about not having VBscript in Excel or a host of other things that our office pack just doesn&#8217;t do. Is Microsoft dumbing it&#8217;s Mac:Office down to make sure the Mac will never [&#8230;] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ari Blackthorne wrote an interesting post today onHere&#8217;s a quick excerptVarious blogs are posting reviews of the new Office for Mac 2008 which according to Wired is due to be released the week of the 14th of January. For all of us who&#8217;ve taken the plunge to intel macs this is good news. Office 2004 was unbearably slow under Rosetta and the beta that I&#8217;ve tried feels a lot more responsive on my Macbook. So far so good. But what about the functionality? Microsoft and Apple both use the Mac Business Unit as an indication that Microsoft is committed to releasing software for the Mac. We mac-users are even special enough that we merit our very own releases. We are also so nice and visual and creative that we don&#8217;t care about not having VBscript in Excel or a host of other things that our office pack just doesn&#8217;t do. Is Microsoft dumbing it&#8217;s Mac:Office down to make sure the Mac will never [&#8230;] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
